![]() Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 1–11.Ĭlegg, C., Fremouw, W., & Mogge, N. Meta-analysis of SIMS scores of survivors of car accidents and of instructed malingerers. International Journal of Psychology Sciences, 1(1), 3–5.Ĭernovsky, Z. Criterion validity of low intelligence scale of the SIMS. International Journal of Psychological Sciences, 1(1), 1–7.Ĭernovsky, Z. Meta-analysis of scale cutoffs in the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 55–65.Ĭernovsky, Z., & Fattahi, M. Psuedodiagnoses of malingering of neuropsychological symptoms in survivors of car accidents by the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. ![]() Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 44–49.Ĭernovsky, Z. Deceptive clinical diagnosing of malingering via Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 34–44.Ĭernovsky, Z. Rogers’s RS and SC malingering scales derived from the SIMS. Archives of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 3(2), 30–38.Ĭernovsky, Z. High risk of false classification of injured people as malingerers by the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(3 Suppl), S132–S151. Systematic review of self-reported prognosis in adults after mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. W., Hartvigsen, J., Donovan, J., Nygren-de Boussard, C., Kristman, V. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, (43 Suppl), 84–105. Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. M., Borg, J., von Holst, H., Holm, L., Paniak, C., Pépin, M., & WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (2004). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(3 Suppl), S152–S173. Systematic review of the prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury in adults: Cognitive, psychiatric, and mortality outcomes: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. W., Borg, J., Nygren-de Boussard, C., & Hartvigsen, J. D., Cancelliere, C., Côté, P., Hincapié, C. Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 274–281. Plausibility judgments of atypical symptoms across cultures: An explorative study among Western and non-Western experts. īoskovic, I., van der Heide, D., Hope, L., Merckelbach, H., & Jelicic, M. On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. Diagnostic utility of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology for identifying psychogenic non-epileptic events. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(2), 182–188. Reliability, validity, and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (Turkish SIMS). C., Kose, S., Solmaz, M., Kulacaoglu, F., & Balcioglu, Y. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 133–140.Īmerican Psychiatric Association. Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting. ![]() We conclude by highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas of future exploration with the SIMS.Īlwes, Y. published a meta-analysis on the SIMS in 2014 an updated diagnostic accuracy table is provided here, including new research since the prior review. This lack of robust discriminant validity means that evaluators need to consider higher SIMS cutoff scores in certain circumstances, which we describe herein. Cutoff scores were quite variable across studies, but when using common cutoff scores, the SIMS does not reliably distinguish feigned psychopathology from severe manifestations of genuine psychiatric illness. Several studies demonstrate convergent validity for the SIMS, as well as incremental validity when compared to clinical judgment based on interview and record review alone. The SIMS purports to measure feigned self-reported symptoms. Several SIMS short forms, alternate scales, and translations have been published. Initial psychometrics reported in the manual were adequate, and since publication, dozens of studies have been published on the SIMS, with practice surveys indicating the measure as one of the most commonly used SVTs. The 75-item, true/false measure samples feigned symptoms across five subscales: Psychosis, Neurologic Impairment, Amnestic Disorders, Low Intelligence, and Affective Disorders. The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) is a stand-alone symptom validity test.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |